vpe-review
/cs:vpe-review <plan> — Throughput-first VP of Engineering interrogation of any plan that touches delivery, eng hiring, team structure, or production discipline. Use when cycle time balloons, DORA metrics slide, or before committing to an eng hiring wave or a reorg.
Estimated installs are a discovery signal based on public repository popularity and source completeness, not recorded Dokki installation events.
Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Pinned commit
f2bac0a8f29b
License
MIT
Execution
Instructions only
Complete source instructions
SKILL.md
/cs:vpe-review — VPE Forcing Questions
Command: /cs:vpe-review <plan>
The throughput-first VPE pressure-tests any plan touching eng operations. Six questions before any delivery commitment, eng hiring expansion, team restructure, or production-discipline change.
When to Run
- Before quarterly delivery commitment (sprint planning, OKR review)
- Before approving an eng hiring plan
- Before restructuring eng teams (splitting/merging squads, adding tribes)
- Before deciding whether to hire a VPE separately from CTO (or merge them)
- When production incidents are increasing
- When sprint velocity is dropping but everyone says "we're working hard"
The Six VPE Questions
1. What's the cycle time, and where does work wait?
No DORA, no diagnosis.
- Lead Time for Changes is the single best health metric
- If you can't decompose cycle time into stages, you can't fix the bottleneck
- Run
delivery_throughput_analyzer.py
2. What's the DORA performance level on all 4 metrics?
One Elite metric and three Lows = bad. Four Highs = healthy.
- Deployment Frequency, Lead Time, MTTR, Change Failure Rate
- The worst metric defines overall level
- Fix lead time first; everything else follows
3. Where is the hiring funnel leaking?
"Can't find good engineers" is wrong.
- Specific stage is over-filtering OR top-of-funnel volume is too low OR offer-to-accept is broken
- Run
eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py - If offer-to-accept < 70%, comp is below market or close discipline is weak
4. Is the team structure healthy for the headcount?
5-9 ICs per squad; 5-8 ICs per EM; 4-6 EMs per director.
- Run
eng_team_structure_designer.py - Manager-trigger fires when 5+ ICs have no dedicated EM
- Director-trigger fires when 3+ EMs report directly to VPE/CTO
5. What's the production discipline maturity?
Level 1-5; aim for Level 3 at growth stage.
- On-call rotation ≥ 6 people
- Severity-defined incident response with blameless postmortems
- SLOs on customer-facing services (pair with
engineering/slo-architect/) - Continuous deployment OR scheduled — not "usually one, sometimes the other"
6. Are we adding a VPE separately, or is CTO doing both?
If CTO is spending > 50% on management vs strategy, VPE is needed.
- Or: VPE complement when CTO is co-founder more comfortable with strategy
- VPE owns operating model; CTO owns architecture
- At small scale (< 20 eng), one person can do both
Workflow
# 1. Delivery throughput
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/delivery_throughput_analyzer.py sprint_metrics.json
# 2. Hiring funnel
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py funnel.json
# 3. Team structure
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_team_structure_designer.py team.json
Output Format
# VPE Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## The Decision Being Made
[throughput | hiring | structure | production | VPE-vs-CTO]
## Delivery Throughput (if applicable)
- DORA overall: Elite / High / Medium / Low
- Worst metric: <DF | LT | MTTR | FR>
- Bottleneck: <stage> (X% of cycle time)
- Top fix: <action + owner>
## Hiring Funnel (if applicable)
- End-to-end conversion: X%
- Weakest stage: <stage>
- Pipeline gap: +N candidates needed
- Top fix: <specific action>
## Team Structure (if applicable)
- Recommended: <informal pods / squads / tribes>
- Manager trigger fired: yes/no
- Director trigger fired: yes/no
- Action: <hire EM | hire director | split squad>
## Production Discipline (if applicable)
- Current maturity level: 1-5
- Next practice to add: <specific>
- SLO coverage: X / Y services
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]
Routing
/cs:cto-review— for architectural causes of throughput problemscs-chro-advisoragent — for hiring funnel comp/leveling issues/cs:cfo-review— for cost-per-hire envelope and eng budget/cs:ciso-review— for production discipline + compliance overlap/cs:decide— log the verdict/cs:freeze 30— on multi-year hiring commitments
Related
- Agent:
cs-vpe-advisor - Skill:
vpe-advisor - Adjacent:
../../../engineering/slo-architect/,../../../engineering/feature-flags-architect/,../../../engineering/chaos-engineering/
Version: 1.0.0
Same repository
Related Skills
agent-launcher-orchestrator
Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).
View detailsagent-protocol
Inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
View detailsarquiteto-de-empresa
Company Architect: builds a business from scratch as an OKF (Open Knowledge Format) bundle — a tree of version-controllable .md files with frontmatter type, links forming a graph, and reserved index.md/log.md, readable by humans and agents. Guides the founder through a 12-phase interview (foundation, strategy, market, financial, sales, marketing, product, operations, tech, people, legal, governance), one phase at a time, few questions per block, and generates the concepts as conformant markdown. Trigger when the user wants to create, structure, or document an entire company in folders and .md files; when they mention build my company from scratch, company as code, company knowledge base for AI to read, company wiki for agents, OKF, or knowledge bundle. In English.
View detailsarquiteto-de-empresa
Company Architect: builds a business from scratch as an OKF (Open Knowledge Format) bundle — a tree of version-controllable .md files with frontmatter type, links forming a graph, and reserved index.md/log.md, readable by humans and agents. Guides the founder through a 12-phase interview (foundation, strategy, market, financial, sales, marketing, product, operations, tech, people, legal, governance), one phase at a time, few questions per block, and generates the concepts as conformant markdown. Trigger when the user wants to create, structure, or document an entire company in folders and .md files; when they mention build my company from scratch, company as code, company knowledge base for AI to read, company wiki for agents, OKF, or knowledge bundle. In English.
View detailsboard-deck-builder
Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.
View detailsboard-meeting
Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:boardroom, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.
View details