Otheralirezarezvani-skills
boost-asio-pro
Use when writing or reviewing asynchronous C++ networking code with Boost.Asio or standalone Asio — TCP/UDP servers and clients, SSL/TLS, timers, strands, io_context, co_spawn, awaitable, async_read/async_write, asio::spawn, yield_context, or pre-C++20 completion-handler callbacks.
3k est. installs25k stars
Estimated installs are a discovery signal based on public repository popularity and source completeness, not recorded Dokki installation events.
Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Pinned commit
f2bac0a8f29b
License
MIT
Execution
Instructions only
Complete source instructions
SKILL.md
Boost.Asio / standalone Asio
Overview
Write async C++ networking code that compiles on the user's Boost, not the newest one. Asio's API changed shape three times (classic io_service → io_context → C++20 coroutines) and most Asio code on the internet is from the first era, so pick the style from the toolchain first, then follow that style's reference file.
References: Boost.Asio · standalone Asio
Use this skill whenever async C++ networking code is being written or reviewed — and especially when the target toolchain is old, where coroutine examples simply will not compile. The three worked implementations it references are CI-verified from Boost 1.62 (2016) through 1.90.
Step 1: pick the style (do this before writing code)
Determine the Boost (or Asio) version and the C++ standard actually in use — find_package(Boost) output, dpkg -l libboost-dev, brew info boost, CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD, or ask. Do not assume the newest.
SSL/TLS in any style: references/ssl.md [blocked]. CMake for any style: references/build.md [blocked].
io_context, make_strand, bind_executor, steady_timer, signal_set, async_read/async_write/async_read_until, buffers and resolver are library features — identical in the coroutine and callback styles. Only the suspension mechanism differs.
Step 2: version floors (verified by compiling, not from docs)
Reach for one of these and the build breaks on older distros:
Distro floors that bite: Debian bookworm ships Boost 1.74 (no awaitable_operators.hpp — #include fails outright), Ubuntu 20.04 ships 1.71 (no any_io_executor), Debian 9 ships 1.62.
Language, not library: the chrono literals 250ms / 30s are C++14. For a true C++11 build write std::chrono::milliseconds(250).
Step 3: the rules that are actually easy to get wrong
A strand does not serialize writes. A strand serializes handler execution, not whole composed operations. Two async_writes in flight on the same strand still interleave bytes on the wire. Full-duplex (a read loop plus concurrent pushes/replies) needs a per-connection strand and an outbound queue with an in-flight flag, so at most one async_write exists at a time. This is the single most common wrong answer about Asio.
Buffers do not own memory. asio::buffer() is a view. Storage must outlive the operation: coroutine locals are fine across co_await in the same frame; in callback style the same data must become a member, not a local.
Connections must outlive their handlers. enable_shared_from_this, and capture self in every co_spawn / handler — read loop, write loop, and each timer.
Frame with composed reads. async_read (fills the buffer exactly) for a length prefix and then the body; never async_read_some, which returns short.
Wrap as_tuple. Always as_tuple(use_awaitable). Bare as_tuple resolves against the operation's default token and compiles in some contexts, fails in others.
async_accept(make_strand(...)) changes two things: it forces an explicit completion token back on the call, and the accepted socket is basic_stream_socket<tcp, strand<...>>, not tcp::socket. Take it by value or with auto — binding it to tcp::socket& will not compile.
Re-arming a timer resolves the pending wait with operation_aborted. In an idle-timeout loop that is the signal to keep waiting, not an error.
GCC needs -fcoroutines for the C++20 style, and header-only Boost needs BOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY defined in exactly one place (CMake).
Anti-Patterns
Boost.Asio vs standalone Asio
Same author, same API — namespace and includes differ.
Support both with a shim, then use net:: throughout:
Before you call it done
Check the code you just wrote against this list:
- Style matches the target Boost version and C++ standard (Step 1), and every API used clears its floor (Step 2).
- Every buffer passed to an async op outlives that op — no callback locals, no dangling
string_view. - At most one
async_writeper socket in flight, enforced by a queue + flag, if anything writes concurrently with reading. - Every async chain on a shared object runs on the same strand;
selfcaptured in every handler andco_spawn. - Framing / delimited reads use composed
async_read/async_read_until. - Errors are handled, not swallowed:
as_tuple(use_awaitable)destructured, or the callback'secchecked, on every op. -
operation_aborteddistinguished from real errors wherever a timer is re-armed or an op is cancelled. - Acceptor sets
reuse_address; shutdown path closes the acceptor and drains sessions. - CMake has the standard,
-fcoroutinesfor GCC (C++20 only),BOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLYin one place, andBoost::coroutineonly if using stackfulspawn. - It compiles. Build it — most of the mistakes above are compile-time, and the version floors are only real once tested.
Worked examples
Three CI-verified implementations of the same full-duplex framed-protocol server, one per style — copy from the one matching Step 1. All three live in the upstream repository and are built by CI on every push.
- market-data-feed — C++20 coroutines (Boost 1.77+; verified 1.83–1.90)
- market-data-feed-precpp20 — callbacks, C++11-clean (verified Boost 1.74+, incl. Windows/MSVC)
- market-data-feed-classic — classic
io_service(verified back to Boost 1.62 / Debian 9)
Official documentation
- Overview: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/latest/doc/html/boost_asio/overview.html
- Reference: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/latest/doc/html/boost_asio/reference.html
- Examples: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/latest/doc/html/boost_asio/examples.html
Cross-References
engineering/docker-development— the old-Boost verification lanes this skill's floors come from are containerised builds (Debian 9 / bookworm, Fedora).engineering/chaos-engineering— for exercising the failure paths this skill tells you to handle: half-open sockets, idle timeouts, partial frames.engineering-team/playwright-pro— the client-side counterpart when the server built here is driven from browser-based integration tests.
Same repository
Related Skills
agent-launcher-orchestrator
Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).
View detailsagent-protocol
Inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
View detailsarquiteto-de-empresa
Company Architect: builds a business from scratch as an OKF (Open Knowledge Format) bundle — a tree of version-controllable .md files with frontmatter type, links forming a graph, and reserved index.md/log.md, readable by humans and agents. Guides the founder through a 12-phase interview (foundation, strategy, market, financial, sales, marketing, product, operations, tech, people, legal, governance), one phase at a time, few questions per block, and generates the concepts as conformant markdown. Trigger when the user wants to create, structure, or document an entire company in folders and .md files; when they mention build my company from scratch, company as code, company knowledge base for AI to read, company wiki for agents, OKF, or knowledge bundle. In English.
View detailsarquiteto-de-empresa
Company Architect: builds a business from scratch as an OKF (Open Knowledge Format) bundle — a tree of version-controllable .md files with frontmatter type, links forming a graph, and reserved index.md/log.md, readable by humans and agents. Guides the founder through a 12-phase interview (foundation, strategy, market, financial, sales, marketing, product, operations, tech, people, legal, governance), one phase at a time, few questions per block, and generates the concepts as conformant markdown. Trigger when the user wants to create, structure, or document an entire company in folders and .md files; when they mention build my company from scratch, company as code, company knowledge base for AI to read, company wiki for agents, OKF, or knowledge bundle. In English.
View detailsboard-deck-builder
Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.
View detailsboard-meeting
Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:boardroom, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.
View details